![]() ![]() The concept of space and time was an interesting theme throughout. But as Schivelbusch writes, “The technological development of the steam engine in the eighteenth century exemplified the gradual process of industry’s emancipation from nature” (pg.2) From this point in history forward, technology would continue to break down the bounds of nature. Nature acts as a limit to mankind’s technological advances. However, it is evident that the Industrial Revolution moves away from nature and toward technology. Until this point in the class, nature has been at the center of our discussion. Contrary to my first impression, The Railway Journey was a riveting book that encompassed much more than just railways. I guess that is why they say “never judge a book by its cover”. The Railway Journey-wow this book sounds so exciting! Not so much at least that was my first impression. On Septemat 12:55 pm | Log in to Reply Timothy Nelson Posted in Industrial Revolution, secondary sources, weekly readings | Tagged Industrial Revolution, secondary sources, weekly readings | 51 Comments 51 Responses This source can be really mind-blowing (especially if you read it on a train!), so I hope you enjoy it. ![]() How did new materials for building shape the spaces people lived and worked?Īnd of course you should come up with your own questions as well.How did time itself change in response to railroads? (People’s subjective sense of time, of course).How did railroads change cities and countrysides?.Just read the text carefully, and this will give you tons of interesting perspective on the way industrialization changed not only the physical, but also the mental world of the 19th century.Ĭonsider the following questions as you read: But for this case, just take it as neutral text.) Because of this, I’m also not giving you much side info in advance. (Well, of course even scholars have their biases. We’re not going to give you as much authorial background in this post as we have in the past – as a secondary source, it doesn’t matter. We ask different questions: How does the author structure an argument? How does he or she use evidence to support the argument? How effective is it? Is anything left out or unproven? These are some of the approaches you can take in the comments.(Some people even like to structure their thoughts in a manner like the framework at this link.) As we said in the first class, reading a secondary source (ie, a work of history or other analysis after the fact) is somewhat different than reading a primary one. Weeks seven and eight will then get into the political reactions.įor the opening reading, we will for the first and only time read a secondary source. For our readings and lectures, we will start with the brute facts of the industrialization, its effects on people’s minds and bodies, and then in week six its effect on society. We begin to leave behind the semi-pastoral world seen at the end of the 18th century, and start to progress to the mechanical, disconcerting, modernist age. This week, we start the first of a several part series on the industrial revolution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |